Applitools vs Percy
Applitools (Visual AI testing) and Percy (Visual AI testing) differ on 6 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.
Oldest fact on this page:
Facts side by side
| Fact | Applitools | Percy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Visual AI testing (also Agentic end-to-end testing, Natural-language test authoring) | Visual AI testing |
| Status | Active | Acquired |
| Test creation | Prompt to test, Natural language, Recording, Autonomous from URL, Code generation | Not documented |
| Test output | Mixed | Not documented |
| Surfaces | Web, Mobile native | Web, Mobile native |
| Hosting | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud |
| Pricing model | Flat tier, Enterprise quote | Free tier, Flat tier, Enterprise quote |
| Published prices | Starter: $667 / mo (paid annually) | Free: $ 0 / month (5000 free monthly screenshots); Desktop: $ 199 / month (billed annually; each additional screenshot at $0.036); Desktop & Mobile: $ 599 / month (billed annually; each additional screenshot at $0.048) |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| CI integrations | GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Other | GitHub Actions, GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Other |
| Self-healing | Documented | Not documented |
| Agent integration | Applitools MCP Server (Eyes): connects AI assistants such as Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Cline and Claude Code to create, update, review and resolve visual tests | BrowserStack MCP server (browserstack/mcp-server) with Percy tools such as percyVisualTestIntegrationAgent, addPercySnapshotCommands, runPercyScan, fetchPercyChanges and managePercyBuildApproval |
| Open source | Not documented | Not documented |
Documented differences
Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.
- Status: active for Applitools; acquired for Percy. [1][2]
- Test creation: prompts, natural-language steps, recording, autonomous exploration from a URL and generated code for Applitools; not documented for Percy. [1]
- Test output: a vendor runner plus exportable framework code for Applitools; not documented for Percy. [1]
- Hosting: cloud and self-hosted for Applitools; cloud for Percy. [1][2]
- Free tier: none for Applitools; available for Percy. [1][2]
- Self-healing: yes for Applitools; not documented for Percy. [1]
When each fits
Related pages
Sources
- applitools.com (Applitools: Category; Applitools: Status; Applitools: Hosting; Applitools: Pricing model; Applitools: Published prices; Applitools: Free tier)
- browserstack.com (Percy: Category)
- browserstack.com (Percy: Status)
- applitools.com (Applitools: Test creation)
- applitools.com (Applitools: Test output)
- applitools.com (Applitools: Surfaces)
- browserstack.com (Percy: Surfaces)
- browserstack.com (Percy: Hosting)
- browserstack.com (Percy: Pricing model; Percy: Published prices; Percy: Free tier)
- applitools.com (Applitools: CI integrations)
- browserstack.com (Percy: CI integrations)
- applitools.com (Applitools: Self-healing)
- applitools.com (Applitools: Agent integration)
- github.com (Percy: Agent integration)
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about Applitools vs Percy? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.