Comparisons

CloudBees Smart Tests vs Tricentis SeaLights

CloudBees Smart Tests (Results analysis and triage) and Tricentis SeaLights (Results analysis and triage) differ on 3 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.

Oldest fact on this page:

Facts side by side

CloudBees Smart Tests and Tricentis SeaLights, fact by fact, with evidence per cell
FactCloudBees Smart TestsTricentis SeaLights
Category
Results analysis and triage
DocumentedSource
Results analysis and triage (also MCP servers for testing)
DocumentedSource
Status
Renamed
DocumentedSource
Acquired
DocumentedSource
Test creation
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Test output
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Surfaces
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Hosting
Cloud
DocumentedSource
Cloud
Vendor-statedSource
Pricing model
Enterprise quote
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented
Published prices
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Free tier
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
CI integrations
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Other
DocumentedSource
Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab
DocumentedSource
Self-healing
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Agent integration
Smart Tests agent skills, installed in Claude Code via a plugin marketplace slash command or for other agents via the skills CLI; `smart-tests view` (e.g. flaky-tests, test-results) returns JSON for AI coding agents
DocumentedSource
SeaLights MCP server: exposes SeaLights functionality as tools that AI models can use to interact with the SeaLights APIs (run via uv or Docker)
DocumentedSource
Open source
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented

Documented differences

Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.

  • Status: renamed for CloudBees Smart Tests; acquired for Tricentis SeaLights. [1][2]
  • Pricing model: enterprise-quote pricing for CloudBees Smart Tests; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
  • CI integrations: Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins and other CI systems for CloudBees Smart Tests; Jenkins, GitHub Actions and GitLab for Tricentis SeaLights. [1][2]

When each fits

CloudBees Smart Tests

Fits a team that needs CI integration with Azure DevOps and CircleCI. Documented for CloudBees Smart Tests.

Sources: [1]

Tricentis SeaLights

The documentation for Tricentis SeaLights does not state enough scope to say when it fits. The fact sheet lists what is documented.

Fact sheet for Tricentis SeaLights

Drawn from documented scope only. Neither text compares the two tools on quality.

Sources

  1. docs.cloudbees.com (CloudBees Smart Tests: Category)
  2. docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: Category)
  3. docs.cloudbees.com (CloudBees Smart Tests: Status)
  4. tricentis.com (Tricentis SeaLights: Status; Tricentis SeaLights: Hosting)
  5. docs.cloudbees.com (CloudBees Smart Tests: Hosting)
  6. cloudbees.com (CloudBees Smart Tests: Pricing model)
  7. docs.cloudbees.com (CloudBees Smart Tests: CI integrations)
  8. docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: CI integrations)
  9. docs.cloudbees.com (CloudBees Smart Tests: Agent integration)
  10. docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: Agent integration)

Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about CloudBees Smart Tests vs Tricentis SeaLights? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.

Report a change