AI QA DirectoryReport a change

Comparisons

Gatling vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Gatling (Performance testing with AI) and Tricentis NeoLoad (Performance testing with AI) differ on 7 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.

Oldest fact on this page:

Facts side by side

Gatling and Tricentis NeoLoad, fact by fact, with evidence per cell
FactGatlingTricentis NeoLoad
Category
Performance testing with AI (also MCP servers for testing, Results analysis and triage)
DocumentedSource
Performance testing with AI
Vendor-statedSource
Status
Active
DocumentedSource
Acquired
DocumentedSource
Test creation
Code generation
DocumentedSource
Recording
DocumentedSource
Test output
Not documented
Not documented
Proprietary runner
DocumentedSource
Surfaces
Web, API
Vendor-statedSource
Web, API, Mobile native
DocumentedSource
Hosting
Cloud, Self-hosted, Hybrid
DocumentedSource
Cloud, Self-hosted, Hybrid
DocumentedSource
Pricing model
Free tier, Flat tier, Enterprise quote
DocumentedSource
Usage credits
DocumentedSource
Published prices
Basic: €89 /month (Billed annually (€1,068/year)); Team: €356 /month (Billed annually (€4,272/year)); Basic: €99 /month (Monthly); Team: €396 /month (Monthly)
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented
Free tier
Yes
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented
CI integrations
GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Other
DocumentedSource
Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, GitLab, Other
DocumentedSource
Self-healing
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Agent integration
Gatling MCP Server (@gatling.io/gatling-mcp-server via npx or gatlingcorp/gatling-mcp-server Docker image, local stdio) for Gatling Enterprise, plus Gatling AI extensions plugin for Claude Code (gatling/gatling-ai-extensions) with skills, and AI Assistant extensions for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf and Antigravity
DocumentedSource
NeoLoad MCP: connects NeoLoad to AI assistants to manage tests and workspaces, launch tests, analyse results and produce reports through natural language
Vendor-statedSource
Open source
Yes, licence Apache-2.0
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented

Documented differences

Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.

  • Status: active for Gatling; acquired for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1][2]
  • Test creation: generated code for Gatling; recording for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1][2]
  • Test output: not documented for Gatling; tests that run on the vendor's runner for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1]
  • Pricing model: flat-tier and enterprise-quote pricing for Gatling; usage-credit pricing for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1][2]
  • Free tier: available for Gatling; not documented for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1]
  • Published prices: listed for Gatling; not documented for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1]
  • Open source: Apache-2.0 licence for Gatling; not documented for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1]

When each fits

Gatling

Fits a team that needs test creation by generated code. Documented for Gatling.

Sources: [1]

Tricentis NeoLoad

Fits a team that needs test creation by recording. Documented for Tricentis NeoLoad.

Sources: [1]

Drawn from documented scope only. Neither text compares the two tools on quality.

Sources

  1. docs.gatling.io (Gatling: Category; Gatling: Test creation)
  2. tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Category)
  3. gatling.io (Gatling: Status; Gatling: Pricing model; Gatling: Published prices; Gatling: Free tier)
  4. tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Status)
  5. docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Test creation; Tricentis NeoLoad: Test output)
  6. gatling.io (Gatling: Surfaces)
  7. docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Surfaces)
  8. docs.gatling.io (Gatling: Hosting)
  9. docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Hosting)
  10. docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Pricing model)
  11. docs.gatling.io (Gatling: CI integrations)
  12. github.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: CI integrations)
  13. docs.gatling.io (Gatling: Agent integration)
  14. tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Agent integration)
  15. github.com (Gatling: Open source)

Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about Gatling vs Tricentis NeoLoad? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.

Report a change