Katalon vs Testim
Katalon (Agentic end-to-end testing) and Testim (Agentic end-to-end testing) differ on 7 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.
Oldest fact on this page:
Facts side by side
| Fact | Katalon | Testim |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agentic end-to-end testing (also AI test management, Test maintenance and self-healing, Mobile testing with AI, API testing with AI) | Agentic end-to-end testing (also Test maintenance and self-healing, Mobile testing with AI) |
| Status | Active | Acquired |
| Test creation | Recording, Code generation, Prompt to test | Recording |
| Test output | Proprietary runner | Proprietary runner |
| Surfaces | Web, Mobile native, API, Desktop | Web, Mobile native |
| Hosting | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Hybrid |
| Pricing model | Free tier, Per seat, Enterprise quote | Free tier, Enterprise quote |
| Published prices | Free: $0 (For students and personal projects); Professional: $84/seat/mo (Billed annually; first 3 seats); Professional: $150/seat/mo (Billed annually; from the 4th seat); Katalon Runtime Engine (add-on): $145 / license / month (add-on); Cross Browser execution environment (add-on): $158 / session / month (add-on); Mobile Devices execution environment (add-on): $158 / session / month (add-on) | Not documented |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| CI integrations | GitHub Actions, GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Other | Azure DevOps, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab, Other |
| Self-healing | Documented | Documented |
| Agent integration | Katalon Studio MCP Server (from Katalon Studio 11.1.0) for Claude, Cursor, Codex, VS Code and Copilot; also a Katalon True Platform MCP Server and a Katalon Documentation MCP Server. | Not documented |
| Open source | Not documented | Not documented |
Documented differences
Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.
- Status: active for Katalon; acquired for Testim. [1][2]
- Test creation: recording, generated code and prompts for Katalon; recording for Testim. [1][2]
- Surfaces: web, native mobile, API and desktop for Katalon; web and native mobile for Testim. [1][2]
- Pricing model: per-seat and enterprise-quote pricing for Katalon; enterprise-quote pricing for Testim. [1][2]
- CI integrations: GitHub Actions, GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps and other CI systems for Katalon; Azure DevOps, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab and other CI systems for Testim. [1][2]
- Agent integration: yes for Katalon; not documented for Testim. [1]
- Published prices: listed for Katalon; not documented for Testim. [1]
When each fits
Katalon
Fits a team that needs test creation by generated code and prompts; API and desktop testing; an agent integration. Documented for Katalon.
Drawn from documented scope only. Neither text compares the two tools on quality.
Related pages
Sources
- docs.katalon.com (Katalon: Category)
- docs.tricentis.com (Testim: Category; Testim: Test creation; Testim: Test output)
- katalon.com (Katalon: Status; Katalon: Pricing model; Katalon: Published prices; Katalon: Free tier)
- tricentis.com (Testim: Status)
- docs.katalon.com (Katalon: Test creation; Katalon: Surfaces)
- docs.katalon.com (Katalon: Test output)
- docs.tricentis.com (Testim: Surfaces; Testim: Hosting)
- katalon.com (Katalon: Hosting)
- testim.io (Testim: Pricing model; Testim: Free tier)
- docs.katalon.com (Katalon: CI integrations)
- docs.tricentis.com (Testim: CI integrations)
- docs.katalon.com (Katalon: Self-healing)
- docs.tricentis.com (Testim: Self-healing)
- docs.katalon.com (Katalon: Agent integration)
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about Katalon vs Testim? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.