OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) vs Tricentis NeoLoad
OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) (Performance testing with AI) and Tricentis NeoLoad (Performance testing with AI) differ on 4 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.
Oldest fact on this page:
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) | Tricentis NeoLoad |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Performance testing with AI | Performance testing with AI |
| Status | Renamed | Acquired |
| Test creation | Recording | Recording |
| Test output | Proprietary runner | Proprietary runner |
| Surfaces | Web, Mobile native | Web, API, Mobile native |
| Hosting | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted, Hybrid |
| Pricing model | Free tier, Enterprise quote | Usage credits |
| Published prices | Not documented | Not documented |
| Free tier | Yes | Not documented |
| CI integrations | Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Other | Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, GitLab, Other |
| Self-healing | Not documented | Not documented |
| Agent integration | Controller Service MCP server (private Beta from version 26.3) for running and stopping load tests from MCP clients; separate DevWeb MCP server in Performance Engineering for Developers | NeoLoad MCP: connects NeoLoad to AI assistants to manage tests and workspaces, launch tests, analyse results and produce reports through natural language |
| Open source | Not documented | Not documented |
Documented differences
Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.
- Status: renamed for OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner); acquired for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1][2]
- Hosting: self-hosted for OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner); cloud, self-hosted and hybrid for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1][2]
- Free tier: available for OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner); not documented for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1]
- CI integrations: Jenkins, Azure DevOps and other CI systems for OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner); Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, GitLab and other CI systems for Tricentis NeoLoad. [1][2]
When each fits
OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner)
Fits a team that needs a free tier. Documented for OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner).
Sources: [1]
Tricentis NeoLoad
Fits a team that needs cloud and hybrid deployment. Documented for Tricentis NeoLoad.
Sources: [1]
Drawn from documented scope only. Neither text compares the two tools on quality.
Related pages
Sources
- admhelp.microfocus.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Category)
- tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Category)
- community.opentext.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Status)
- tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Status)
- admhelp.microfocus.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Test creation; OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Test output)
- docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Test creation; Tricentis NeoLoad: Test output)
- opentext.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Surfaces; OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Pricing model)
- docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Surfaces)
- admhelp.microfocus.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Hosting; OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Free tier)
- docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Hosting)
- docs.tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Pricing model)
- admhelp.microfocus.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): CI integrations)
- github.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: CI integrations)
- admhelp.microfocus.com (OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner): Agent integration)
- tricentis.com (Tricentis NeoLoad: Agent integration)
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about OpenText Performance Engineering (LoadRunner) vs Tricentis NeoLoad? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.