AI QA DirectoryReport a change

Comparisons

ReportPortal vs Tricentis SeaLights

ReportPortal (Results analysis and triage) and Tricentis SeaLights (Results analysis and triage) differ on 6 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.

Oldest fact on this page:

Facts side by side

ReportPortal and Tricentis SeaLights, fact by fact, with evidence per cell
FactReportPortalTricentis SeaLights
Category
Results analysis and triage (also MCP servers for testing)
DocumentedSource
Results analysis and triage (also MCP servers for testing)
DocumentedSource
Status
Active
DocumentedSource
Acquired
DocumentedSource
Test creation
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Test output
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Surfaces
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Hosting
Cloud, Self-hosted
DocumentedSource
Cloud
Vendor-statedSource
Pricing model
Free tier, Flat tier, Enterprise quote
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented
Published prices
Startup (SaaS): $569 for package per month (billed quarterly); Business (SaaS): $2,659 for package per month (billed quarterly)
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented
Free tier
Yes
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented
CI integrations
Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Other
DocumentedSource
Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab
DocumentedSource
Self-healing
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Not documented
Agent integration
ReportPortal MCP Server (reportportal/reportportal-mcp-server) for Claude Desktop, Cursor and GitHub Copilot in VS Code: query launches and failures, run analyses
DocumentedSource
SeaLights MCP server: exposes SeaLights functionality as tools that AI models can use to interact with the SeaLights APIs (run via uv or Docker)
DocumentedSource
Open source
Yes, licence Apache-2.0
DocumentedSource
Not documented
Not documented

Documented differences

Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.

  • Status: active for ReportPortal; acquired for Tricentis SeaLights. [1][2]
  • Pricing model: flat-tier and enterprise-quote pricing for ReportPortal; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
  • Free tier: available for ReportPortal; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
  • CI integrations: Azure DevOps, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins and other CI systems for ReportPortal; Jenkins, GitHub Actions and GitLab for Tricentis SeaLights. [1][2]
  • Published prices: listed for ReportPortal; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
  • Open source: Apache-2.0 licence for ReportPortal; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]

When each fits

ReportPortal

Fits a team that needs a free tier. Documented for ReportPortal.

Sources: [1]

Tricentis SeaLights

The documentation for Tricentis SeaLights does not state enough scope to say when it fits. The fact sheet lists what is documented.

Fact sheet for Tricentis SeaLights

Drawn from documented scope only. Neither text compares the two tools on quality.

Sources

  1. reportportal.io (ReportPortal: Category)
  2. docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: Category)
  3. reportportal.io (ReportPortal: Status)
  4. tricentis.com (Tricentis SeaLights: Status; Tricentis SeaLights: Hosting)
  5. reportportal.io (ReportPortal: Hosting; ReportPortal: Free tier)
  6. reportportal.io (ReportPortal: Pricing model; ReportPortal: Published prices)
  7. reportportal.io (ReportPortal: CI integrations)
  8. docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: CI integrations)
  9. reportportal.io (ReportPortal: Agent integration)
  10. docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: Agent integration)
  11. github.com (ReportPortal: Open source)

Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about ReportPortal vs Tricentis SeaLights? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.

Report a change