Testkube vs Tricentis SeaLights
Testkube (Results analysis and triage) and Tricentis SeaLights (Results analysis and triage) differ on 7 documented facts below. Each cell shows its evidence level, source and verification date. This page does not rank or rate either tool.
Oldest fact on this page:
Facts side by side
| Fact | Testkube | Tricentis SeaLights |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Results analysis and triage (also MCP servers for testing, Testing assistants) | Results analysis and triage (also MCP servers for testing) |
| Status | Active | Acquired |
| Test creation | Prompt to test | Not documented |
| Test output | Not documented | Not documented |
| Surfaces | Web, API | Not documented |
| Hosting | Cloud, Self-hosted, Hybrid | Cloud |
| Pricing model | Flat tier, Usage credits, Enterprise quote | Not documented |
| Published prices | Pro: $700/ mo (per runner agent); AI add-on: 200 AI Sessions / mo: $199/mo (add-on to a paid plan; includes 3 Test Creation seats); AI add-on: 500 AI Sessions / mo: $499/mo (add-on to a paid plan; includes 10 Test Creation seats) | Not documented |
| Free tier | Not documented | Not documented |
| CI integrations | GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, CircleCI, Other | Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab |
| Self-healing | Not documented | Not documented |
| Agent integration | Testkube MCP Server (hosted endpoint, CLI and Docker setup) exposing test orchestration to MCP clients such as Claude, Cursor and GitHub Copilot | SeaLights MCP server: exposes SeaLights functionality as tools that AI models can use to interact with the SeaLights APIs (run via uv or Docker) |
| Open source | Yes, licence MIT and Testkube Community License (TCL), per file | Not documented |
Documented differences
Listed only where both tools document the fact, or where one documents it and the other's documentation does not mention it. Vendor-stated values appear in the table but do not create a difference here.
- Status: active for Testkube; acquired for Tricentis SeaLights. [1][2]
- Test creation: prompts for Testkube; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
- Surfaces: web and API for Testkube; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
- Pricing model: flat-tier, usage-credit and enterprise-quote pricing for Testkube; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
- CI integrations: GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, CircleCI and other CI systems for Testkube; Jenkins, GitHub Actions and GitLab for Tricentis SeaLights. [1][2]
- Published prices: listed for Testkube; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
- Open source: MIT and Testkube Community License (TCL), per file licence for Testkube; not documented for Tricentis SeaLights. [1]
When each fits
Tricentis SeaLights
The documentation for Tricentis SeaLights does not state enough scope to say when it fits. The fact sheet lists what is documented.
Drawn from documented scope only. Neither text compares the two tools on quality.
Related pages
Sources
- docs.testkube.io (Testkube: Category; Testkube: Test creation)
- docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: Category)
- docs.testkube.io (Testkube: Status)
- tricentis.com (Tricentis SeaLights: Status; Tricentis SeaLights: Hosting)
- docs.testkube.io (Testkube: Surfaces; Testkube: CI integrations)
- docs.testkube.io (Testkube: Hosting)
- testkube.io (Testkube: Pricing model; Testkube: Published prices)
- docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: CI integrations)
- docs.testkube.io (Testkube: Agent integration)
- docs.sealights.io (Tricentis SeaLights: Agent integration)
- github.com (Testkube: Open source)
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about Testkube vs Tricentis SeaLights? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.