Replay.io
By Replay. Category: Autonomous exploration. Homepage
Replay's documentation describes Replay QA as an autonomous QA service that explores a web app like a user, saves flows as journeys and reports bugs with root-cause analysis. Testing starts from the URL of a running app, and journeys run in Replay Browser. CI integrations are documented for GitHub Actions and CircleCI. A Replay MCP server works with Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and other MCP clients, and a REST API is available to coding agents. Replay announced in July 2024 that it would discontinue Replay Test Suites on August 31 of that year.
Description written from the vendor's documentation.
Status
Status: Active
Facts
| Fact | Value | Evidence | Source | Verified on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | Active | Documented | docs.replay.io | |
| AI capabilities | Documented | docs.replay.io | ||
| Test creation | Documented | docs.replay.io | ||
| Test output | Not documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Surfaces | Documented | docs.replay.io | ||
| Hosting | Documented | replay.io | ||
| Pricing model | Documented | replay.io | ||
| Free tier | Yes | Documented | replay.io | |
| CI integrations | Documented | docs.replay.io | ||
| Self-healing | None documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Agent integration | Replay MCP server (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and other MCP clients); Replay QA REST API for coding agents | Documented | docs.replay.io |
Published prices
| Plan | Price | Billing |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | always free; 25 credits a month |
| Starter | $17 per month | $204 billed annually; 50 credits a month |
| Pro | $170 per month | $2,040 billed annually; 500 credits a month |
| Private Cloud | $1,000+ | per month · starting price; contact sales |
| On-Prem | $5,000+ | per month · starting price; contact sales |
Vendor-stated, verbatim
What Replay says about its product, quoted as published and not confirmed in documentation.
“Paste a link to any running web app and get a bug report in minutes.”
Alternatives
Tools in the same category (Autonomous exploration), ordered by the number of shared creation and surface values, then by name. Each line lists documented facts that differ from Replay.io.
- AegisRunner: documents output Mixed; hosting hybrid
- AI QA Framework (brentkastner): Autonomous exploration; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier
- Appvance IQ: documents creation by recording
- AutoExplore: documents no free tier
- CARBON by Testers.ai: documents creation by prompt to test
- Manta AI: documents output Proprietary runner; creation by prompt to test; hosting hybrid
Comparisons
Questions
Is this page a review of Replay.io?
No. This page is a fact sheet. Each fact shows its evidence level, its source and the date it was checked. We do not rate or rank tools.
Does Replay.io have a free tier?
Yes. Replay.io has a free tier. This is documented, checked on 2026-09-24.
What test output does Replay.io produce?
The test output format is not documented as of 2026-09-24.
Is Replay.io still available?
Status: Active, checked on 2026-09-24.
Sources
- Replay QA homepage Opened
- Replay QA pricing Opened
- Replay docs home Opened
- Replay QA overview (docs) Opened
- Replay QA GitHub Actions integration (docs) Opened
- Replay QA CircleCI integration (docs) Opened
- Replay MCP overview (docs) Opened
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about Replay.io? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.