AudioEye
By AudioEye. Category: Accessibility testing with AI. Homepage
AudioEye's knowledge base and developer documentation describe AudioEye as a web accessibility platform. The AudioEye Scanner is a cloud service that checks web pages for accessibility issues. For developers, the AudioEye Testing SDK adds accessibility checks to Jest, Playwright and Cypress tests and offers a CLI that can upload SARIF results to GitHub code scanning. An MCP server connects the SDK to coding agents including Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code and Claude Desktop. The SDK requires an AudioEye client ID and token. The pricing page lists Automated, Self-Managed and Managed tiers without printed prices.
Description written from the vendor's documentation.
Status
Status: Active
Facts
| Fact | Value | Evidence | Source | Verified on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | Active | Vendor-stated | audioeye.com | |
| AI capabilities | Documented | developer.audioeye.com | ||
| Test creation | Not documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Test output | Not documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Surfaces | Documented | help.audioeye.com | ||
| Hosting | Documented | help.audioeye.com | ||
| Pricing model | Documented | audioeye.com | ||
| Free tier | Not documented | Not documented | None found | |
| CI integrations | Not documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Self-healing | None documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Agent integration | AudioEye MCP server (@audioeye/testing-sdk-mcp) for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Zed and Claude Desktop | Documented | developer.audioeye.com |
Published prices
No prices are published. The pricing model includes quotes on request.
Vendor-stated, verbatim
What AudioEye says about its product, quoted as published and not confirmed in documentation.
“Detects up to 2.5x more issues than other tools”
“Detects up to 253% more issues than other automated accessibility solutions”
“37 of 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria, more than any other automated tool”
“up to 50% of issues detected within minutes of installation”
“300-400% more protection than competition”
“Automated tools addressing ~50% accessibility issues”
Alternatives
Tools in the same category (Accessibility testing with AI), ordered by the number of shared creation and surface values, then by name. Each line lists documented facts that differ from AudioEye.
- accessFlow: documents creation by autonomous from URL, recording; no free tier
- AudioEye Testing SDK: documents hosting self-hosted
- Axe MCP Server: documents hosting self-hosted, hybrid; no free tier
- BrowserStack Accessibility Testing: documents a free tier
- Deque axe: documents hosting self-hosted; a free tier
- Evinced: Accessibility testing with AI; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier
Comparisons
Questions
Is this page a review of AudioEye?
No. This page is a fact sheet. Each fact shows its evidence level, its source and the date it was checked. We do not rate or rank tools.
Does AudioEye have a free tier?
A free tier is not documented for AudioEye as of 2026-09-24.
What test output does AudioEye produce?
The test output format is not documented as of 2026-09-24.
Is AudioEye still available?
Status: Active, checked on 2026-09-24.
Sources
- AudioEye homepage Opened
- AudioEye plans and pricing Opened
- AudioEye Testing SDK documentation Opened
- AudioEye Testing SDK: MCP server Opened
- AudioEye Testing SDK: CLI Opened
- AudioEye Knowledge Base Opened
- AudioEye Knowledge Base: Products Opened
- The AudioEye Scanner Opened
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about AudioEye? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.