AI QA DirectoryReport a change

ContextQA

By ContextQA. Category: Agentic end-to-end testing. Homepage

ContextQA's documentation describes an AI platform that creates, runs and maintains tests for web applications, iOS and Android apps, REST APIs, Salesforce and SAP. Tests are written in natural language or recorded. Self-healing updates tests when the application changes. ContextQA runs the browsers and devices used for execution. Its MCP server can export test cases as runnable code, including Playwright TypeScript. The docs cover GitHub Actions, Jenkins, Azure DevOps and CircleCI. The MCP server works with Claude, Cursor, VS Code Copilot and custom agents.

Description written from the vendor's documentation.

Status

Status: Active

Facts

ContextQA: facts with evidence level, source and verification date
FactValueEvidenceSourceVerified on
StatusActiveDocumentedcontextqa.com
FoundedNot documentedNot documentedNone found
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, USAVendor-statedcontextqa.com
AI capabilities
  • Test case generation
  • Self healing
  • Results analysis
  • No code
Documentedlearning.contextqa.com
Test creation
  • Natural language
  • Recording
Documentedlearning.contextqa.com
Test outputMixedDocumentedlearning.contextqa.com
Surfaces
  • Web
  • Mobile native
  • API
  • ERP
Documentedlearning.contextqa.com
Hosting
  • Cloud
Documentedlearning.contextqa.com
Pricing model
  • Outcome based
  • Enterprise quote
Documentedcontextqa.com
Free tierNoDocumentedcontextqa.com
CI integrations
  • GitHub Actions
  • Jenkins
  • Azure DevOps
  • CircleCI
Documentedlearning.contextqa.com
Self-healingDocumentedDocumentedlearning.contextqa.com
Agent integrationContextQA MCP Server (test automation tools for Claude, Cursor, VS Code Copilot or custom MCP agents)Documentedlearning.contextqa.com

Published prices

DocumentedPricing pageVerified

No prices are published. The pricing model includes quotes on request.

Vendor-stated, verbatim

What ContextQA says about its product, quoted as published and not confirmed in documentation.

  • “ContextQA cut our regression testing time by 80%.”
    SourceSeen
  • “Our team scaled automation 10x without needing specialist coders.”
    SourceSeen
  • “99.9%+ uptime”
    SourceSeen

Alternatives

Tools in the same category (Agentic end-to-end testing), ordered by the number of shared creation and surface values, then by name. Each line lists documented facts that differ from ContextQA.

  • ACCELQ: documents output Proprietary runner; hosting self-hosted, hybrid; a free tier
  • Opkey: Agentic end-to-end testing; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier
  • DevAssure: documents output Proprietary runner; hosting self-hosted
  • Eggplant Test: documents output Proprietary runner; hosting self-hosted; status acquired
  • Endtest: documents output Proprietary runner; hosting self-hosted
  • Leapwork: documents output Proprietary runner; hosting self-hosted, hybrid

Questions

Is this page a review of ContextQA?

No. This page is a fact sheet. Each fact shows its evidence level, its source and the date it was checked. We do not rate or rank tools.

Does ContextQA have a free tier?

No. ContextQA has no free tier. This is documented, checked on 2026-09-24.

What test output does ContextQA produce?

Output: Mixed. This is documented, checked on 2026-09-24.

Is ContextQA still available?

Status: Active, checked on 2026-09-24.

Sources

  1. ContextQA homepage Opened
  2. ContextQA pricing Opened
  3. ContextQA documentation home Opened
  4. ContextQA docs: Introduction Opened
  5. ContextQA docs: Architecture overview Opened
  6. ContextQA docs: MCP Server overview Opened
  7. ContextQA docs: GitHub Actions Opened
  8. ContextQA docs: GitLab CI Opened
  9. ContextQA docs: Jenkins Opened
  10. ContextQA docs: Azure DevOps Opened

Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about ContextQA? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.

Report a change