noqa
By noqa. Category: Mobile testing with AI. Homepage
noqa's documentation describes it as an automated mobile testing tool for apps and games. Test cases are written in natural language or generated with AI. An agent executes them visually, without locators. Tests run on noqa-managed cloud devices or, in Local mode, through a Mac desktop app driving the user's own devices. Pipelines trigger runs through a public REST API. A CLI with a noqa-testing skill works with Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. The docs state that an MCP server is planned.
Description written from the vendor's documentation.
Status
Status: Active
Facts
| Fact | Value | Evidence | Source | Verified on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | Active | Documented | noqa.ai | |
| AI capabilities | Documented | docs.noqa.ai | ||
| Test creation | Documented | docs.noqa.ai | ||
| Test output | Proprietary runner | Documented | docs.noqa.ai | |
| Surfaces | Documented | docs.noqa.ai | ||
| Hosting | Documented | docs.noqa.ai | ||
| Pricing model | Documented | noqa.ai | ||
| Free tier | Yes | Documented | noqa.ai | |
| CI integrations | Documented | docs.noqa.ai | ||
| Self-healing | None documented | Not documented | None found | |
| Agent integration | noqa CLI with the noqa-testing skill for Claude Code, Cursor and Codex; docs say an MCP server is on the way (Team plan lists 'MCP server') | Documented | docs.noqa.ai |
Published prices
| Plan | Price | Billing |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 forever | $5 of noqa agent credits included |
| Individual | $29 / month | $0.02 per agent step |
| Team | From $100 / month | $0.03 per agent step |
Vendor-stated, verbatim
What noqa says about its product, quoted as published and not confirmed in documentation.
“~5s per action — and ~1s once memory kicks in for a familiar flow.”
“Costs less per action than calling a frontier LLM API directly.”
“7× fewer tokens per look”
“Run full regression in minutes, not days.”
“Run suites in parallel on 1,000+ real cloud devices”
Alternatives
Tools in the same category (Mobile testing with AI), ordered by the number of shared creation and surface values, then by name. Each line lists documented facts that differ from noqa.
- AutoMobile: documents hosting self-hosted
- Digital.ai Testing: documents output Mixed; creation by recording; hosting self-hosted; status acquired
- Drizz: Mobile testing with AI; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier
- FinalRun: documents hosting self-hosted
- HeadSpin: documents hosting self-hosted; no free tier
- Panto AI: documents hosting self-hosted
Questions
Is this page a review of noqa?
No. This page is a fact sheet. Each fact shows its evidence level, its source and the date it was checked. We do not rate or rank tools.
Does noqa have a free tier?
Yes. noqa has a free tier. This is documented, checked on 2026-09-24.
What test output does noqa produce?
Output: Proprietary runner. This is documented, checked on 2026-09-24.
Is noqa still available?
Status: Active, checked on 2026-09-24.
Sources
- noqa homepage Opened
- noqa pricing Opened
- noqa docs: Overview Opened
- noqa docs: Introduction Opened
- noqa docs: Test Cases Opened
- noqa docs: Generate test cases with AI Opened
- noqa docs: CLI & MCP Opened
- noqa docs: Running Tests: Local vs Cloud Opened
- noqa docs: Cloud Opened
- noqa docs: CI/CD Opened
- noqa docs: Desktop application Opened
- noqa docs: How noqa agent works Opened
- noqa docs index (llms.txt) Opened
- GitHub: noqa-ai/noqa Opened
Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about noqa? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.