AI QA DirectoryReport a change

QA.tech

By QA.tech. Category: Autonomous exploration. Homepage

QA.tech's documentation describes QA.tech as a testing service in which AI agents crawl a web application and run tests against it. Tests are created from UI suggestions or an AI chat, as goals and plain-language steps that the agent executes in the cloud. Exported test cases are JSON definitions rather than framework code. The docs cover web, mobile app and API testing, and the product flags WCAG accessibility violations. CI integration is documented for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Bitrise, Azure DevOps, CircleCI and Jenkins. An MCP server connects to clients including Claude Code, Cursor and Codex.

Description written from the vendor's documentation.

Status

Status: Active

Facts

QA.tech: facts with evidence level, source and verification date
FactValueEvidenceSourceVerified on
StatusActiveDocumenteddocs.qa.tech
AI capabilities
  • Test case generation
  • Autonomous testing
  • Accessibility checks
  • Copilot assistance
Documenteddocs.qa.tech
Test creation
  • Natural language
  • Prompt to test
  • Autonomous from URL
Documenteddocs.qa.tech
Test outputProprietary runnerDocumenteddocs.qa.tech
Surfaces
  • Web
  • Mobile native
  • API
Documenteddocs.qa.tech
Hosting
  • Cloud
Documenteddocs.qa.tech
Pricing model
  • Enterprise quote
Documentedqa.tech
Free tierNot documentedNot documentedNone found
CI integrations
  • GitHub Actions
  • GitLab
  • CircleCI
  • Jenkins
  • Azure DevOps
  • Other
Documenteddocs.qa.tech
Self-healingVendor statedVendor-statedqa.tech
Agent integrationQA.tech MCP server at https://api.qa.tech/v1/mcp; documented clients: Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Continue, Linear AgentDocumenteddocs.qa.tech

Published prices

Not documentedVerified

No prices are published. The pricing model includes quotes on request.

Vendor-stated, verbatim

What QA.tech says about its product, quoted as published and not confirmed in documentation.

  • “320h/mo”
    SourceSeen
  • “390h of testing each quarter”
    SourceSeen
  • “529%”
    SourceSeen
  • “$4M+”
    SourceSeen
  • “QA.tech uses specialized AI agents to test your application like humans would, but faster and more thoroughly.”
    SourceSeen

Alternatives

Tools in the same category (Autonomous exploration), ordered by the number of shared creation and surface values, then by name. Each line lists documented facts that differ from QA.tech.

  • AegisRunner: documents output Mixed; hosting hybrid; a free tier
  • Appvance IQ: documents creation by recording
  • CARBON by Testers.ai: documents hosting self-hosted; a free tier
  • Nimbal AI: Autonomous exploration; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier
  • SmartBear BearQ: Autonomous exploration; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier
  • Jina: Autonomous exploration; no documented difference in output, creation, hosting or free tier

Comparisons

Questions

Is this page a review of QA.tech?

No. This page is a fact sheet. Each fact shows its evidence level, its source and the date it was checked. We do not rate or rank tools.

Does QA.tech have a free tier?

A free tier is not documented for QA.tech as of 2026-09-24.

What test output does QA.tech produce?

Output: Proprietary runner. This is documented, checked on 2026-09-24.

Is QA.tech still available?

Status: Active, checked on 2026-09-24.

Sources

  1. QA.tech homepage Opened
  2. QA.tech pricing Opened
  3. QA.tech docs home Opened
  4. QA.tech docs index (llms.txt) Opened
  5. AI Agents Opened
  6. Crawling Sessions Opened
  7. Creating Tests Opened
  8. CI/CD Integration Opened
  9. Mobile App Testing Opened
  10. MCP Server Opened
  11. Exporting Test Cases Opened

Spotted an outdated or wrong fact about QA.tech? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.

Report a change