Blog / Category guides

Agentic end-to-end testing tools: 54 tools on the facts

Published by AI QA Directory on . Built from the catalogue data as of that date; tool pages carry the current facts.

The catalogue lists 54 tools whose primary category is agentic end-to-end testing, as of 2026-09-24. Another 30 tools list it as a secondary category. This guide sets out what the 54 document about test creation, output, hosting, pricing and status.

What the category covers

The category definition reads: "Platforms that generate and maintain end-to-end tests for web apps with AI agents." With 54 tools, it is the largest category in the catalogue. Natural-language test authoring follows with 33 tools.

How tests are created

The creation approach is documented for 46 tools and vendor-stated for 8. A tool can document more than one approach, so the counts below overlap. They cover the 46 documented cases only.

  • Natural language: 33 tools
  • Prompt to test: 20 tools
  • Recording: 19 tools
  • Code generation: 13 tools
  • Autonomous from a URL: 8 tools

What the tests are written in

The output format is documented for 39 tools, vendor-stated for 2 and not documented for 13. Among the 39 documented:

  • Proprietary runner: 23 tools
  • Mixed: 11 tools
  • Standard Playwright: 5 tools

The five tools with documented standard Playwright output are AISquare Studio QA, Bugzy, Checksum, Octomind and Quorvex AI, sorted by name. No tool in the category documents standard Cypress or Selenium output. Standard Playwright output for BlinqIO AI Test Engineer is vendor-stated, not documented. Our post on checking test output ownership covers this fact in more detail.

Where the tools run

Hosting is documented for 41 tools, vendor-stated for 9 and not documented for 4. Among the 41 documented, 32 offer cloud hosting. 21 offer self-hosting. 5 offer a hybrid option. A tool can offer more than one option.

Pricing model and free tier

The pricing model is documented for 40 tools, vendor-stated for 4 and not documented for 10. Among the 40 documented:

  • Enterprise quote: 32 tools
  • Free tier: 23 tools
  • Flat tier: 15 tools
  • Usage credits: 14 tools
  • Per seat: 6 tools
  • Outcome-based: 2 tools
  • Managed service: 2 tools

The free-tier fact is documented as available for 23 tools. It is documented as unavailable for 6 tools. It is vendor-stated for 1 tool and not documented for 24. The pricing page lists published prices with their sources.

Status changes

As of 2026-09-24, 48 tools in the category are active, 4 are acquired and 2 have shut down. The table lists the status events recorded for tools in the category, newest first.

Status changes
DateToolEventEvidence
2026-09-01DogQShut down: a search-index copy of the homepage states the platform fully closes on this datevendor-stated
2026-05OctomindShut down: a farewell letter states the product would be turned off at the end of May 2026documented
2025-03-25UiPath Test CloudLaunched: UiPath announced Test Clouddocumented
2024-04-09Jetify TestPilotRenamed: the vendor jetpack.io renamed itself Jetifydocumented
2022-02-09TestimAcquired: Tricentis announced the acquisitiondocumented
2021-06-29Copado Robotic TestingAcquired: Copado announced an agreement to acquire Qentineldocumented
2020-06-25Eggplant TestAcquired: Keysight Technologies completed the acquisition of Eggplantdocumented
2018-03-28Eggplant TestRenamed: Testplant renamed the combined company Eggplantvendor-stated

The DogQ domain, dogq.io, returned HTTP 503 on 2026-09-24. Bugzy has the status acquired, and that status is vendor-stated. The Bugzy homepage states that Bugzy is now part of Felan. It gives no date or deal terms. The status page lists every event in the catalogue.

The agentic end-to-end testing hub lists all 54 tools with filters and sortable columns.

Feature hubs

Comparisons within the category

Sorted by page name: Autify vs Functionize, Autify vs Opkey, Autify vs QA Wolf, Autify vs Testim, Bugzy vs Octomind, Functionize vs mabl, Functionize vs Opkey, Functionize vs QA Wolf, Functionize vs Testim, Katalon vs Testim, mabl vs Testim, Opkey vs QA Wolf, Opkey vs Testim, QA Wolf vs mabl, QA Wolf vs Testim.

Alternatives pages

Sorted by tool name: Autify, BugBug, Functionize, Katalon, Leapwork, Opkey, QA Wolf, Testim, Tricentis Tosca.

Sources

Spotted an outdated or wrong fact? Send the source and we apply it at the next monthly update.

Report a change